Quantcast
Channel: Why should Java 8's Optional not be used in arguments - Stack Overflow
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 29

Answer by Mark Perry for Why should Java 8's Optional not be used in arguments

$
0
0

There are almost no good reasons for not using Optional as parameters. The arguments against this rely on arguments from authority (see Brian Goetz - his argument is we can't enforce non null optionals) or that the Optional arguments may be null (essentially the same argument). Of course, any reference in Java can be null, we need to encourage rules being enforced by the compiler, not programmers memory (which is problematic and does not scale).

Functional programming languages encourage Optional parameters. One of the best ways of using this is to have multiple optional parameters and using liftM2 to use a function assuming the parameters are not empty and returning an optional (see http://www.functionaljava.org/javadoc/4.4/functionaljava/fj/data/Option.html#liftM2-fj.F-). Java 8 has unfortunately implemented a very limited library supporting optional.

As Java programmers we should only be using null to interact with legacy libraries.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 29

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>